The source chosen for this phase was Orphans of the AIDS epidemic? The extent, nature and circumstances of child-headed households in South Africa.
This article’s authors are Helen Meintjes, Katharine Hall, Double-Hugh Marera and Andrew Boulle. The Journal name is AIDS Care, and this is in Volume 22, No. 1. The article is found in PsychINFO and can be located in EBSCOhost.
This site is credible because:
The authors of the journal article are clearly identified and provides information of their credentials.
The article has many references which has seemingly provided them with information as they look at this specific area of orphans.
This article is free of advertising and does reveal information from both viewpoints-- that which expresses the vulnerability of child-only households and that which expresses the great need of other households as well.
This article was first submitted in 2008, revised in 2009 and came out in print January of 2010, allowing for a more recent look at information on the topic.
The time period and information is adequate for what I desired to find out as I researched.
This source is helpful for research of this topic because of its focused look at child-only households versus ‘mixed generation’ households, allowing us to see truths and needs of both home situations. This will also be helpful for my audience as we seek to discover where the need is-- child-only households, yes, but also opening our eyes to be aware that there are many needy households with vulnerable family members in difficult situations.
Response:
As I initially read this article, I found myself responding in a way that did not want to agree with their claims or findings in the survey they had taken. As I continued to read, however, I was confronted with the realization that I had put the needs of children and orphans into a box and into my own mental image.
Child-only households are not the only households in need. These households face difficulties and vulnerability that will forever be out of my full grasp of understanding, but needs also lie in households that have hold children and orphans and a single or young parent, or children that live with other generations within their family.
Within their study, there had been an increase in the number of orphans in South Africa from 2002 to 2006 to 3.7 million children(37). Some of these children were without one parent and some were, as they called them, “double orphans”, having lost bother parents (41). They noted that throughout this rise in orphans, the number of child-only households did not increase, that they could notice (42). This is definitely a wonderful thing, considering the great despair that can one can imagine from that situation. From their survey, there was a total of 304 people, from 105,000 total, who were living in “child-only” household conditions. (47)
I must agree with them, that needs lie outside of merely living in a household without any parents, or guardians. Many other households headed with one adult or a young adult, as they have pointed out, will face great difficulties in poverty and at times their need will be overlooked. I, then, must agree with their apparent desire to make the needs of these other households known. These needs are near to God’s heart.
I must continue to say, however, that 304 individuals, is a sad number. It is wonderful that it is not larger and it has not significantly increased, but I must also agree with their claim that this “estimated 112,000 in 2006, the number of children living in this extreme condition is of concern” (47).
My eyes have been opened to my biases and to the mental image I had painted of the poor and needy, and am becoming aware of the other needs that lie in circumstances apart from these “child-only” households. But, the need for the 112,000 in South Africa alone is still great. The true need is not only found in child-headed households, or only double orphans. Many are hurting, battling, and struggling, and I cannot overlook them.